Pension Reform: Employees Are Seeing Changes

by | Mar 27, 2017 | 403(b)/457, Analysis

The effects of the 2008 financial crisis on the average American’s savings—and the emotional impact of those effects—have contributed to the push for financial reform. The effects of the crisis on retirement savings for those in defined contribution plans have been well documented, but the effects on defined benefits plans have been less apparent—until now.

How has the crisis affected employees in state and local pension systems? What measures have pensions taken to defray rising costs? In January 2017, the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College released findings that identify common trends and document the reforms to state and local pension plans.

The researchers studied all the major state-sponsored plans and 132 local pension plans, including the largest local pension systems in each state. They studied plan reforms between 2009 and 2014. The types of reforms that they identified include changes to employee contributions, COLAs, benefit factors, the time period used in calculating the final average salary, retirement age, years-of-service requirements, and plan type (defined contribution versus defined benefit). They considered whether these reforms applied to all employees or only to new employees and whether the reforms were implemented in states with pension reform legal protections. Understanding the interesting results of this study may aid you in helping public-sector clients understand whether and how the reforms will affect them.

The research shows that 74% of state plans implemented reforms during the period. Almost half (48%) of the state plans made changes that would affect new employees. Approximately one-fourth (26%) of the state plans made changes that applied to all employees.

In contrast, only 57% of local plans have enacted reforms. New employees bore the brunt of changes to local plans: 34% of local plans made changes that affected only new employees, and 23% made changes that affected all employees.

The study contrasts the difference between the state and local plans (74% versus 57% making changes) and speculates that changes at the local level may be deterred by strong police and fire unions or economic impacts on smaller cities with high rates of public employment.

Changes for Current Employees

Many states have legal protections that protect employee benefits and make it difficult to change benefit factors, years-of-service requirements, and the final average salary period. These protections can apply to already-accrued benefits as well as future benefits in many states. The most frequently cited changes for current employees were increasing employee contributions and reducing the pension COLA. The report states, “While the increase in employee contributions does reduce an employee’s net pension benefit (the portion of the benefit that is paid for by the employer), the prevalence of the reform suggests that it is viewed differently than direct reductions to benefits.” Many states do not view the COLA as a core benefit and thus COLAs have less legal protection.

Among state plans, 17% increased employee contributions, and 9% reduced the COLA. Among local plans, 12% increased contributions and 13% reduced the COLA. In a handful of cases, state and local governments actually reduced core benefits for current employees.

The following state pensions reduced core benefits for current employees.

  • Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
  • North Dakota Teachers’ Retirement Fund
  • Ohio Public Employees Retirement System
  • Rhode Island Employees’ Retirement System
  • South Dakota Retirement System
  • Vermont Teachers’ Retirement System
  • Virginia Retirement System

Changes for New Employees

No states offer legal protection for new employees’ benefits, so pension reforms for new employees underwent many more changes in core areas. Among state plans, the top three changes for new employees’ benefits were increasing the tenure requirements (60%), expanding the period used for calculating the final average salary (42%), and increasing employee contributions (33%). Local plans underwent similar changes, with the top three being increasing tenure requirements (36%), changing the benefit factor (31%), and changing the period used to calculate the final average salary.

Like everyone else, state and local governments were impacted by the financial crisis. In the push to reduce costs and fund budgets, many government employees will pay the price. Only time will tell how this ultimately impacts the growing movement away from defined benefit plans toward defined contribution plans and whether we will see more states offering defined contribution or hybrid plans.

What seems clear is that those in pension systems may not be as secure in retirement as they had hoped. They will need advice on ways to improve their retirement readiness. Thank you to all you advisors who are serving our public-sector employees and helping get them on track for retirement!

If you are looking for help educating your clients about their pension benefits, Retire Ready Solutions has unique retirement software for the 403(b) and 457 markets to help you simplify the education process. Check it out today!

 


 

Download a Free Trial of our TRAK Software Today!

Find out how TRAK can help out in the 403(b) and 457 markets.

Free Trial

Take-Aways from the Social Security Trustees’ Report

On June 5th, the Board of Trustees of the Social Security Trust Fund released their annual report. As you may expect, the report does not paint a rosy picture for the future of Social Security. Below are some take-aways from the report.

Choice is the Driving Factor in 403(b) Participation

Teachers face many challenges in the classroom, carefully balancing the demands placed on them. 403(b) Retirement planning advisors have an opportunity to serve them with wise guidance, helping them navigate the challenges of securing a quality retirement with ease and confidence.

How will Trump’s Tax Plan Affect your Clients?

As we sit on the eve of Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration, there are many questions about the direction President Trump will take on different issues and policies. Many of these questions are coming from the financial services industry and while much of the talk has centered on the fate of...

Five Congressional Retirement Bill Highlights

While it seems that there is little that Republicans and Democrats see eye to eye on, one area of bi-partisan agreement centers on retirement reform. Many Americans are in dire financial straits and a potential retirement crisis looms in the future…

Ironmans and Financial Advisors

Recently I finished a Half Ironman Triathlon in St. George, Utah. It was a great race: swimming 1.2 miles, biking 56 miles, and then running the half-marathon, 13.1 miles. That’s 70.3 miles in total! The elevation gain of just over 4,400 feet had me contemplating quitting. At times, it felt like torture. But I finished, and for me, I finished well, just 26 seconds shy of six hours. I was thrilled! I exceeded my expectations on a very tough course.

Survey on 403b Provider Options Reveals Surprising Results

New 403b plan survey data released today by the National Tax-Deferred Savings Association reveals that increased participation and contribution rates actually increase with the number of provider options offered to participants.

Simple is Hard

Helping people get engaged in their retirement planning is much easier than you might think—you just have to keep it really simple. Getting clients motivated about retirement when they are young, well before age 85, can become a passion as well.